WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • CHIRLA faces scrutiny over its role in a nonprofit network that coordinates responses to ICE activity across Los Angeles.
  • The organization reported nearly $34 million in government contract revenue, with California accounting for about 96% of that amount.
  • The Trump administration froze remaining federal funds for CHIRLA’s citizenship programs in February.
  • A court denied CHIRLA’s preliminary injunction request, while a separate lawsuit was dismissed for lack of standing.

A Los Angeles nonprofit supported by taxpayer money is under scrutiny over allegations that it helped organize resistance to federal immigration enforcement operations. The questions emerged as federal agents conducted a new round of immigration enforcement activity across Southern California.

Attorney Laura Powell with Californians for Good Governance pointed to the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, known as CHIRLA, as a central player in efforts to monitor and respond to ICE operations. CHIRLA is a Los Angeles group advocating for immigrants.

Powell detailed the organization’s involvement with the Los Angeles Rapid Response Network. The network is a coalition of nonprofit organizations that coordinates responses to ICE activity in the region.

According to Powell’s description, CHIRLA plays a significant role in that coordinated effort. The group’s participation has drawn attention because it receives substantial funding through government contracts.

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.

CHIRLA Executive Director Angelica Salas previously announced that the network’s hotline had received more than 50 calls about ICE activity. Those calls also included reported sightings of “men in military garb.”

Salas has referred to SEIU California President David Huerta as her “brother.” Huerta was arrested during a protest after blocking the path of an ICE vehicle.

Governor Gavin Newsom also backed Huerta following the arrest. Newsom claimed that the SEIU California president had merely been “witnessing” the action when the incident occurred.

The public funding received by CHIRLA is substantial, according to figures cited by Powell. Financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, showed that the nonprofit reported nearly $34 million in government contract revenue.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from BoredTrashPanda.com, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

California accounted for about 96% of that government contract revenue. The nearly $34 million total represented a sharp increase from the roughly $12 million in government contract revenue that CHIRLA reported during the previous year.

Several government agencies provided funding to the organization. They included the California Department of Social Services, the California Arts Council, the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, and the Department of Homeland Security.

Federal funding awarded to CHIRLA included grants connected to citizenship instruction and naturalization services. That funding has since become a point of conflict between the organization and the Trump administration.

Powell argued that the arrangement forces taxpayers to support an organization involved in resistance to lawful federal immigration enforcement. She also connected CHIRLA’s activities with its lobbying arm and support for Democrats seeking public office.

“Your tax dollars fund an organization that organizes efforts to directly interfere with the federal government’s lawful exercise of authority. Then, through its lobbying arm, that organization helps get Democrats elected to office, who then repay the favor by ensuring increased funding,” Powell summarized.

The Trump administration moved to terminate federal funding for CHIRLA’s citizenship programs. Remaining funds connected to those programs were frozen in February.

CHIRLA responded to that move by filing a lawsuit. A court denied the organization’s motion for a preliminary injunction in May, leaving the funding freeze in place.

The nonprofit also filed a separate lawsuit related to the dispute. That case was dismissed for lack of standing.

The controversy places CHIRLA’s taxpayer support, rapid response activities, and opposition to ICE enforcement under a brighter spotlight. The organization’s government contract revenue rose from roughly $12 million to nearly $34 million in a single year, with California providing about 96% of the latter amount.

At the same time, the Trump administration’s attempt to cut federal support has produced multiple legal challenges from CHIRLA. So far, the nonprofit has failed to secure a preliminary injunction, while its separate lawsuit was dismissed for lack of standing.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of BoredTrashPanda.com. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.