WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • Mike Rogers rejected Kristen Welker’s framing during a contentious Meet the Press interview about Abdul El-Sayed and the Muslim Brotherhood.
  • Rogers accused the national press of giving El-Sayed a pass while ignoring questions about his letters, funding, and political associations.
  • Welker cited Rogers’s 2012 comments, but he argued that she had removed them from their intelligence and regional security context.
  • Rogers said voters should examine El-Sayed’s political thinking, funding, and support rather than treating the controversy as a religious issue.

With just over a week remaining before Election Day, Michigan Republican Senate nominee Mike Rogers is making his closing pitch to voters. His campaign has pushed harder since his final debate against Democrat nominee Abdul El-Sayed last Wednesday.

During that debate, Rogers pressed the former Wayne County health department director on education, ICE, support for law enforcement, loyalty to America, and loyalty to Michigan residents. El-Sayed struggled through the exchange as Rogers repeatedly challenged his positions.

The debate proved damaging enough that El-Sayed and his campaign issued a statement afterward. In it, the Democrat declared that he was a capitalist and emphatically denied being a socialist, an argument that did little to quiet the controversy.

Then came the familiar media rescue operation. Meet the Press moderator Kristen Welker confronted Rogers on Sunday in a contentious interview focused heavily on El-Sayed’s alleged ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.

MORE NEWS: Fani Willis Becomes a Voter Fraud Victim and the Irony is Priceless [WATCH]

Welker began by citing a post from President Trump that attacked El-Sayed and then insisted there was no evidence supporting the president’s claims. She demanded that Rogers say whether he agreed with Trump, framing the question as a simple yes or no proposition.

Rogers refused to accept that premise. Instead, he argued that the national press was twisting itself into knots to avoid examining El-Sayed’s relationship with the ideas and political thinking associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Rogers pointed to a letter involving Morsi from 2012 and 2013, including language about purging the police and media. He also said El-Sayed had received money from groups supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and Hezbollah.

The Republican nominee framed the dispute as a matter of political thinking rather than religion. Referring to his own military service, Rogers told Welker, “It’s not how you pray; it’s how you think.”

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from BoredTrashPanda.com, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Welker countered that El-Sayed had denounced the Muslim Brotherhood, but Rogers rejected her attempt to soften his record. As the pair talked over one another, Rogers asked, “I don’t know why you give this guy a pass” and added, “I get you guys want to defend this guy,” while citing unanswered questions noted by The New York Times.

Welker then tried to provide what she called context for the 2012 letter. She argued that Egyptians were rising against a brutal dictatorship and that El-Sayed supported protesters opposing Egypt’s dictator, not the Muslim Brotherhood as an organization.

She also presented remarks Rogers made in 2012 about engaging with certain members of the group. Those remarks were: “Do I think there are moderate Muslim Brotherhood individuals we are going to have to reach out to and talk to? Yes. But we are going to have to watch it carefully.”

Rogers immediately rejected Welker’s comparison. “That — that is so much out of context, I wish you would’ve done this for Abdul El-Sayed. That would’ve been a great interview,” he told her before accusing her of twisting the issue to defend her position.

Close

MORE NEWS: Trump Unloads on El-Sayed as Michigan Senate Showdown Nears [WATCH]

Welker insisted that she did not have a position. Rogers continued, explaining that his 2012 remarks involved intelligence relationships between Israel and Egypt that the Muslim Brotherhood was trying to undo, which he said would have meant greater violence in the region.

Rogers said that, as chairman of the Intelligence Committee, his objective had been to preserve that relationship. He recalled saying, “We’re going to have to find a way to try to not sever that relationship,” while arguing that Welker had stripped those comments of their actual context.

He also described the Muslim Brotherhood as both an ideology and a political group, noting that five Muslim countries had banned it for extremism. Rogers further argued that El-Sayed had family connections, supported the group through his letter, and benefited from money that voters should consider.

Rogers said the Muslim Brotherhood supported only one candidate’s primary victory in the country, El-Sayed’s. He also criticized its treatment of women, concluding, “I think that’s an issue. I mean, that’s just not consistent with American values.”

Welker was later fact-checked on X over her characterization of El-Sayed’s 2012 letter as support for protesters rather than the Muslim Brotherhood. With nine days remaining before voters choose their next United States senator, Rogers stayed focused and refused to play along with Welker’s gotcha routine.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of BoredTrashPanda.com. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.