WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • Scott Jennings challenged CNN panelists over media predictions that President Trump’s Greenland deal would never happen.
  • Jennings said Denmark’s prime minister delivered a strongly supportive United Nations speech focused on America, Trump, and national security.
  • He argued the deal was completed despite prolonged warnings about damaged relations with Denmark, Europe, and NATO.
  • Jennings also stirred debate over Trump booting CNN, Politico, and MSNBC from the White House.

Scott Jennings once again turned a CNN panel into a classroom, challenging the press corps’ chorus of alarm over President Trump’s Greenland deal.

The Salem Radio host and CNN contributor argued that predictions of diplomatic wreckage with Denmark did not match what viewers heard from the nation’s prime minister at the United Nations.

Jennings’ point was not subtle. Critics had treated Trump’s Greenland deal as proof that relations with Denmark had been ruined, Europe had been weakened, and NATO had been damaged, but Jennings said the prime minister’s remarks cut against that entire narrative.

The exchange gave Jennings another opportunity to do what he repeatedly did on CNN this week: confront a panel with information that did not fit the prevailing panic.

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.

The press said the Greenland deal would never happen, yet Jennings emphasized that it did.

He opened by stressing the magnitude of the development.

“It was a momentous thing.”

Jennings then unloaded on the prolonged outrage that surrounded the issue.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from BoredTrashPanda.com, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

“And for a year and a half or almost two years now, I’ve been listening to everyone have a complete and total hysterical meltdown about this, about how we’ve ruined our relationship with Denmark, about how this has weakened Europe and weakened NATO, blah, blah, blah.”

That list of supposed consequences captured the media case Jennings was rejecting.

His argument rested on the contrast between those dire claims and the tone struck by the prime minister, whose United Nations address he described as supportive of America, Trump, and national security.

“If you listen to her speech today, it could not have been more pro-American and pro-Trump and pro national security, and it was perfect!”

WATCH:

For Jennings, the speech was not merely a pleasant surprise.

It was evidence that the apocalyptic commentary about Denmark, Europe, and NATO had failed to account for what was actually unfolding before the public.

He drove that point home with a short verdict on the result. “And it got done despite all of the hysteria.”

The remark cut to the heart of his case against the press reaction.

The predictions were loud, the warnings were sweeping, and the outrage lasted for a year and a half or almost two years, according to Jennings, but the Greenland deal still got done.

Jennings then connected that earlier wave of alarm to claims surrounding Iran.

He argued that hearing more hysteria, including claims involving the Iranian military, left him thinking that the Trump administration might once again be moving in the correct direction.

“So when I hear the same hysteria, people coming out here and claiming somehow we’ve decimated the entire Iranian military, and that means they’re winning…I somehow feel like maybe, just maybe, we’re on the right track!”

His comparison was aimed squarely at the credibility of those offering the latest round of warnings.

Jennings did not accept their alarm as proof that Trump was failing, especially after watching the same style of commentary surround the Greenland deal before it got done.

The CNN contributor also stirred the network’s tent over President Trump booting CNN, Politico, and MSNBC from the White House.

WATCH:

Jennings has become the designated conservative hitter on CNN, and the latest exchange showed why.

While panelists and members of the press leaned into familiar warnings, he pointed to the prime minister’s United Nations speech and the completed deal as answers to the hysteria.

The result was classic Jennings: direct, sharp, and unwilling to let the media’s earlier predictions vanish without scrutiny.

On a network where conservative pushback can be in short supply, he again forced the panel to contend with a development the press had insisted would never happen.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of BoredTrashPanda.com. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.